Learn & Share

Hi All,We are facing performance issue while loading and exporting data in MDM. We have around 30 million records. We are loading data in chunks and initial few execution were very quick. After processing 20M we are observing severe degrade in performance. Now even for 10K records the job is taking 8-10 hours for both load and export. We have applied parallelism wherever its possible. Is there any other thing which we need to consider/implement which will enhance the performance?TIA.

Hi folks,I’ve been given details to an SFTP server, and I can successfully connect to it using Winscp on my laptop: I tried to setup connection in ONE desktop:I put workflow task:But I get an error:14.11.2024 15:15:21 [INFO] Using following licenses:14.11.2024 15:15:21 [INFO] C:\Users\mkwok\license_hamilton_USER_v14_subscription_2025-01-29.plf14.11.2024 15:15:21 [INFO] ============================================================14.11.2024 15:15:21 [INFO] This is a subscription USER license for developers' laptops for "Hamilton". It expires on 2025-01-29.14.11.2024 15:15:21 [INFO] ============================================================2024-11-14 15:15:21 [INFO] com.ataccama.lib.securityutil.javaencryption.DefaultEncryptionEngine messageId=createDefaultKeyProvider reason=the 'properties.encryption.keystore' property not specified2024-11-14 15:15:21 [INFO] com.ataccama.lib.securityutil.javaencryption.DefaultEncryptionEngine messageId=createDefaultKeyProvid

Hi,Can some help me with creating a post processing transformation plan that shows a different row for each DQ rule that has passed/failed on a particular field in the transformation plan in One Web UI. For Eg: I have 2 rules, a uniqueness check and a format check on the ID field. In the post processing output file, what’s the best way to see how I can split this for each rule and see the pass/fail metrics for each rule.Thanks

Hi Team need your expert opinion on how to tag Policies to Business Terms or any other assets(Applying policies to asset types) in 14.5 version? I cannot see any options for the same is it any version limitation or any customization needs to be turned on. Any help is appreciated.

Hello all,I want to create a DQ rule, In this rule I need to check a numeric field if the value is in the predefined interval or not. Let me give an example of logic. I have a column X contains ‘types of product’ and column Y contains ‘value of product’. And have a list of valid values. If the value of X is ‘abc’ then Y must be in the interval 1-30. If hte value of X is ‘xyz’ then Y must be in 1-200 and so on.I was going to create a lookup file for this one, but couldn’t be sure how to define intervals. Does someone know how to implement my DQ rule for this logic ? Thanks a lot !

I have an ETL process that’s run on-demand and refreshes master data referenced by several Ataccama catalog items. There’s about 60 lookup items that are created from catalog item attributes that I need to update immediately following the master data refresh. I know there’s a lookup item “Update” button in the Ataccama web interface and a method to schedule refreshes; however, I haven’t been able to find a way to update lookup items on-demand, such as through a GraphQL mutation.Is there an available mutation for updating lookup items on-demand, or another method that could be utilized?

Taking reference of CDI Example, I have multiple contact values for the same person and I want all of these contacts to be a part of the contact master entity. I am not sure how the same instance record id will affect this. Will ataccama load both these records? Will both these records partivipate in match logic(same master_party_id, same_contact_type,same contact_value) or will it consider just the first one?Also, if someone can please confirm if the master_party_id is id for master record derived on processing of all party records?

Hi Ataccama community. Could you please share examples of plans used for adding a new metadata entity and bulk loading values from excel file.We have an excel file with sensitivity level defined for each attribute. We need to add an entity called e.g. sensitivity level and to import this from excel file.  

Issue: We receive files to be tested against our DQ rules (Monitoring Projects) every 2 weeks.  Each set of files is referenced by its date created (aka 2024-10-01,2024-10-14...).  When running Monitoring Projects against these items we only get the Execution Date which can be different from the file date.   When extracting data for reporting from ONE we only have the Extraction Date and don’t necessarily know which file date the plan results are for (sometimes have to rerun old files for new rules etc..).  Question:  Is there a way to add a custom attribute / parameter for when we run the Monitoring Project (at the processing id level) so we can report our DQ results by File date?  The 2 options we could think of: In extraction component connect to the catalog items and get the file date which is in the table itself (tried this but we need to extract history so would need file date, catalog item, and Monitoring Project processing id to join with DQ Aggregation Results tasks in the com

I’ve recently noticed that some jobs I’m trying to kill, jobs which happen to running for much too long (~2 days), take a long time to kill. Is that a bug in the kill function or maybe related to the jobs themselves taking so long to run?

Hi All,I have a few observations regarding the source_id column in matching step of an entity in a MDM project.For context, source_id is a column with unique values (Primary Key in most cases) that we define to uniquely identify each record in a source system, connected to mdm hub.I was recently trying to test the match logic on OneDesktop using plan files. I used a very small subset of records from each source.Load ComponentIn the project, source_id column(defined in load component) for one of these source system is “SOURCE_SYSTEM_NAME~^~pk_id”where SOURCE_SYSTEM_NAME is as string value and pk_id is the primary key. match componentWhen we defined a match component in mdm project, we do not define standalone bindings but assumably “Id Column” would be mapped to source_id column if we are testing on OneDesktop as a plan.So, when I created a plan to test the match logic, I mapped “Id Column” to source_id (with source_id having string values as mentioned above). But when I run the plan wi

Hello everyone, We recently upgraded to version 13.9.3, and gained the ability to export DQ rules from one Ataccama environment and import them into another. This works great, but I need to do the same thing for our monitoring projects. I would like to be able to export them from DEV and import them into a higher environment.  Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be a plan available in my version to export monitoring projects. Has anybody figured out a way to migrate monitoring projects without recreating them in each environment? Alternately, I am considering trying to write my own plan. Is there any documentation out there on how to write the JSON for export plans? Thanks!

If we use matillion ETL tool for  data integration to snowflake. Can we still see the lineage and transformation code in Ataccama?

Hi - I wanted more information on how to use the slices vs a SQL Catalog Item.The use case being often when I’m leveraging a slice I want to be able to do a start date of  >2023 , if it is part of a  quality program I want the data to keep updating i.e as new records come in. However, it seems like the slice is only really designed for the ‘previous’ so ignores current records i.e previous year = 2023, and I can’t set the custom date without an end date so it would be limited to a fixed time range.It seems like for the quality program is better served with the SQL CAT ITEM but I was curious if there was value with the slice I was missing or if I could accomplish the same objective with the slice ? Thank you, Lindsay  

Hi,I want to create a DQ aggregation rule that checks fields from two different tables for the group by clause. Is there a way to do this directly in Ataccama One Web UI.Thanks!

Hi,I am not able to access the transformation plan feature in v15.3 from both the Transformation Plan tab and from the monitoring projects tab. Can someone explain why is there a restriction on creating transformation plans and how can I get access to it?Thanks

I have a One Data table created by importing data from a .csv file.  I need to use some of the data in this table by joining it with an existing Catalog Item by creating a SQL Catalog Item so that I can implement some rules on it.  Where you select the source when starting to create the SQL Catalog Item I do not get an option to select oneData.  Is it even possible to do this in OneWeb?

Debugging - is this possible to i.e. setup some breakpoint and let the application run all the previous steps before selected one?I like using debug function on steps (CTRL+Shift+D). To debug below Step i need to first debug all the previous steps and then i am able to debug the current one.However, if I happen to update logic on some step from the top i then would need to run & debug all the previous steps before i could debug i.e. Multiplicative Regex Matching.Is this possible to automate the manual work here? I would like to create a breakpoint on Multiplicative Regex Matching and each time i could just click a button and it would self-debug from the start to my breakpoint. I looked in your documentation but didn’t found any solution for this. I found some debugging view in ONE Desktop but it doesn’t allow me to add breakpoints.Do i need to configure my debugger somehow to achieve the above? Szymek

Hi,I have a question about the rule logic display when a section is applied. In the report view, I can see the rule logic/implementation when I select a rule. However, once I select a section and do the same, I can only see the valid and invalid results, not the rule logic. Is there a reason behind it? Thank you!

How to load result data from Ataccama ONE MDM to ERP systems like SAP?

I have a scenario where I do not want to deactivate the source party records in Ataccama, even though it no longer exists in the source. Is there a way to achieve this?