Discuss data, share best practices, learn, and grow with Ataccama's Community.
Recently active
In Monitoring Project Data quality rule suggestion works sometimes and it give rules already used or as per term assigned to catalog item but most of the time it doesn't work. At point of time, ruleΒ suggestions appear, and they disappear when you want to check again.Β How the rule suggestions work in Monitoring Project of Ataccama?Β Is there any pattern or do we have to do something so that we can rule suggestions?
Is there a way to identify usage stats, last login etc easily?Β or if someone has built a query to show this information?Β I would think the admin would have an easy where to manage users access / licenses etc
Is there a way to retrieve all the workflows deployed on the Ataccama runtime server? For instance, we can obtain all the monitoring projects and post-processing details from the Ataccama metadata model. Additionally, I would like to get the workflow names along with their associated plans and component files from the runtime server.
While importing the configuration in Monitoring Project from different monitoring Project, we can map catalog item but unable to it on column level.Β Here column names are getting changed in databrick layers (foundation, Enriched, curated).Β Is there any way to import configuration from one project to another project with column mapping as names gets changed?
Architectural Diagram for Data Quality and Governance
I am new to Ataccama and have some basics questions on how to start .is the ataccama one desktop and DQ analyzer are same tool orΒ different ? i have installedΒ ataccama one desktop but how to get trial license ?Β
How do we create a detection rule which either using both data andΒ metadata option in same rule or ability to add multiple detection rules on business glossary with AND and OR conditions both working together and not just one option?Β Β
Can the API response generated from the Data Quality Firewall feature be edited?
HiI have with great success been using your free desktop version of DQ Analyzer.But the license has run out. Last time I had this issue a new download and aΒ re-installation solved it.I have tried to do the same, but it did not work.Β Β See issue βDQ analyzer windows version updateβ for further details.Any advice what to do?
The Business wants this date attribute validated.Β I donβt know why, itβs a key field and I assume managed by the DB.Β Nonetheless, I need to build a rule.But I think itβs strange that the Data Type is DATEΒ while the date values are YYYY-MM-DD. I would expect to see DATE format data in theΒ MM-DD-YYY HH:MM:SS AM format.I donβt know how to code it in the date functions since it doesnβt have the standard date format and it doesnβt work in any string functions.Any ideas?Β Β
Hi everyone,Β If youβre looking for a way to bulk upload relationships between attributes and business terms in Ataccama, there are two main approaches you can use: Metadata Writer step and GraphQL API. Both methods allow you to establish these relationships efficiently.Option 1: Metadata WriterThe Metadata Writer method enables you to create relationships between attributes and business terms by structuring your data appropriately. Hereβs what you need to do:Entity: Use termInstance as the entity type. Parent ID: This should be the ID of the attribute you want to link. Target: This should be the ID of the business term you want to associate with the attribute. State: Set this value to published to ensure the relationship is active.Once youβve prepared a file containing these details, you can upload it using the Metadata Writer, automating the bulk linking process.Option 2: GraphQL APIAnother approach is leveraging the GraphQL API. This involves:Capturing the API requests made when manu
I have created a plan for data quality checks using Data Quality Indicator, and it will produce an excel file which flags each records with error_messages corresponding to each checks, and a summary txt file. Now, I have createdΒ a workflow using Run DQC and Send Mail step. The requirement is to soft code the below values in the email template.Summary excel fileBelow is the email body:Dear Business Users,Please find the attached Error Result (Error_Report.csv), which details the records that failed validation and their respective error types.Summary:Total Processed Records(Total):Β Total Error Records(Success_Count):Β Error Types(Code):Β We recommend reviewing the attached file and taking the necessary corrective actions. If you need further clarification or assistance, please feel free to reach out.Best regards,Β
Is there a method to create a single rule for identifying duplicate records based on all columns in a table? This rule should be applicable to all tables, regardless of the number of columns they contain.Current situation we need to add the column to use aggregated rule. It is very difficult if the columns are more than 10 or 15 in table.Β Β
I am making a DQ evaluation rule in ataccama one ui where I have to subtract each long value of catalogue item from its corresponding long value in lookup and if the difference is greater than 100, I want to raise that particular value as invalid sample, so far I am not able to achieve this, it would be great if anyone can help me with this.
Is there any way to get notification for data Profiling schedule failure with log details or successful.
We made changes into the clean operation of an entity. it will take effects for new transactions.How can we apply this to the current records that we already have into the database?Β We are exploring use a full reprocess of this entity:but we have some doubts about the setup. For example:What is the difference between a reprocess vs rematch checkbox?Β We tried to read the documentation but there is not detail explanation about it.Β Thanks in advance!
Hi everyone,Β Managing email notifications effectively is essential for monitoring Data Quality and ensuring timely alerts. In this post, we will explore the differences between general and specific notifications and how to enable specific email notifications, as they are turned off by default in self-managed installations.What is the difference between general and specific notifications?General notifications are triggered based on predefined system-wide scenarios, such as monitoring failures or anomalies. These notifications alert users to general events occurring in the system, ensuring broad visibility into key operational issues. However, general notifications do not include detailed Data Quality results.On the other hand, specific notifications provide more granular alerts, tailored to particular data quality conditions, thresholds, or projects. These notifications are linked to specific configurations, allowing users to receive alerts based on structured errors, Data Quality issue
HiI have a sub-query in Snowflake that is using the function of LISTAGG and PARTITION BYΒ in multiple SELECT DISTINCT statements for example LISTAGG(DISTINCT TRIM(SUBJECT_REF), ' | ') OVER (PARTITION BY IDENTIFIER) AS EN_NUM_AGG, kindly see attachment to see the full SQL statement.Β Example of one of the subqueries:Β β¦en AS(SELECT DISTINCTΒ Β Β Β IDENTIFIER,Β Β Β ID,Β Β Β LISTAGG(DISTINCT ID, ' | ') OVER (PARTITION BY IDENTIFIER) AS ID_AGG,Β Β Β TRIM(SUBJECT_REF) AS EN_NUM,Β Β Β LISTAGG(DISTINCT TRIM(SUBJECT_REF), ' | ') OVER (PARTITION BY IDENTIFIER) AS EN_NUM_AGG,Β Β Β DQ_EN_CARD,Β Β Β LISTAGG(DISTINCT DQ_EN_CARD, ' | ') OVER (PARTITION BY IDENTIFIER) AS DQ_EN_CARD_AGG,Β Β Β DATA_SOURCE,Β Β Β ORIGINAL_SOURCEFROMΒ Β Β db.schema.view1Β Β Β WHEREΒ Β Β Β subj_type = 'English') ...I wanted to replicate the same in Ataccama ONE Desktop using the Group Aggregator step, whereI allocate each sub-query in one aggregation set with a condition ofΒ subj_type = '<value>'Β in the When condition. For each column in the SELE
Weβre using version 15.4, mostly in the web tool.Weβre trying to a subset of our input tables for testing before implementation the full table(s) in Production.We looked at using Data Slices, but we found that the ROWNUM feature of SQL met our purpose better:Β select * from (select * from dbname.tblname) where ROWNUM <=10000Our primary question is how do we link/connect the SQL View and/or the Data Slice to the DQ Rule.Β We believe that it occurs in the Monitoring Project.Β I looked thorough the Ataccama online documentation, and the Community,Β but I canβt find the options to make these either of these connections.Any ideas!Thanks!TimΒ
What is the AQLΒ to filter all catalog itemsβ attributes tagged with a particular term?
Hi all,I would like to share the guidance of Ataccama Support regarding a question that I had with respect to using relationship types. I suppose the question will become relevant for us all at some point. So hereby the question and Ataccama's response.Β QuestionβIn the metadata model we can define relations between entities by means of references, or we can embed properties from other entities etc.Another way toΒ define relations between entities is by means of relationship types. The latter option allows us to visualize the relation in for instance a relationship tab, like there is for terms.Suppose you are to model new entities. There is no requirement to have this visualized in a relationship tab. So you define a reference from one entity to the other. Later a requirement pops up from a new project, that the relation should be depicted in theΒ relationship tab. So, unfortunately, not possible. Changing the reference into a relationship type is a major system change.Β Then always choose
Hi all,Β Can anyone help me with what this Add location feature do which is available in overview tab of Source connection?Β
Hi everyone,Β In this post, Iβll walk you through regex-based detection checks. Understanding regex-based detection checks is crucial for ensuring data quality, validation, and anomaly detection. One common question that arises is about the % threshold when specifying such a check.What does % threshold mean in regex-based detection checks?When applying a regular expression (regex) check, the % threshold represents the proportion of data entries that must match the regex pattern in order for the check to pass.For example, if you set the threshold to 70%, it means that at least 70% of the data elements must match the regex pattern for the detection check to be considered successful.Common misconception: Matching data vs. matching regexA frequent point of confusion is whether the threshold means:70% of the data should match the regex (Correct) 70% of the regex should match each data element (Incorrect)A regex pattern either matches or doesnβt for each data element - it does not partially m
Is there a way to quickly select only distinct rows in Ataccama One Desktop?Β (I now used a record descriptor and filter with Regex find(β.:.:1β, rd_column)
I applied two rules to a monitoring project, but I only want to export the results for one of the rules. In the post-deployment plan, I initially used a filter where the column is not null, and it worked fine. However, it exported all results where the column was not null, meaning the results of both rules were included. I would like to update the filter to only export specific invalid samples, but it's not working, as no data is being exported. Is this filter correct? Previously, it was "Column Name IS NOT NULL," and I updated it to "Column Name IS NOT NULL AND Column Name = 'XYZ specified ruleβHow can i resolve this ?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.