Recently active topics

Hello Team,I am trying to create a data quality rule for completeness, but it fails every time I click on evaluate.I tested my rule, and it works fine.Could you please advise me on this?  This is the rule i created 

Hi everyone,I’ve personally noticed quite a regression recently—after one of the newer Ataccama updates (even in our Cloud environments!), we lost access to the MinIO GUI admin console and several useful storage management features.I was wondering what caused this until I came across a report that explains everything: MinIO has officially killed off its free version (Community Edition). On February 12, 2026, their GitHub repository was updated with a final, definitive message: "THIS REPOSITORY IS NO LONGER MAINTAINED".What exactly happened: For the past 18 months, the creators of MinIO have been systematically stripping features from the free version (which explains the missing GUI we are now experiencing). Public Docker images and binaries have been completely removed, halting the ability to patch security vulnerabilities (CVEs). The only supported option left is their commercial product, AIStor, with a starting price of $96,000 a year. Since Ataccama uses MinIO under the hood as

Hello, I am working on a use case in RDM so the use case is that is it possible that can I split a record into two records such that the old record gets replaced by those new records for eg- How can I be able to achieve this?Thank you,

Hi Team,I am seeking support to capture the Monitoring Project execution results—either as an attachment or as a downloadable result link—and automatically send notifications to a defined list of recipients.Do we have any documentation covering this scenario?Kindly advise on the recommended approach: should this be configured through the Web UI or through ONE Desktop?This requirement is high priority for us, as we need to set up and enable the notification workflow as soon as possible.Regards,Suriyanath TC

HiWe created SQL Catalog Item but it is not getting auto updated when the metadata changes in parent table. How to make it auto update?

Looking step by step info. how to create create virtual catalog item in local  atacamma on desktop environment Version 14.5I am trying to create using local host urls.

Hi everyone,I wanted to share a simple optimization that gave me a massive runtime improvement in Ataccama ONE Desktop expressions: switching from regular expressions to plain substring search using indexOf().Previously, I used regex to check whether explanation fields contain a specific message. After switching to indexOf(), the runtime dropped from hours to seconds.As I understand correctly after what i found regex processing is based on a full Java regular-expression engine (java.util.regex), which is powerful but can be expensive if you only need a simple “contains substring” check.Expression example:case( indexOf(nvl(valid_rules_explanation, ''), 'text') >= 0, 1, indexOf(nvl(invalid_rules_explanation, ''), 'text') >= 0, 1, invalid_rules is not null, 0, 1)ONE expressions use 0-based indexing for string positions, so a match at the beginning returns 0, which is why >= 0 is used. indexOf(srcStr, subStr) returns the index of the first occurrence of subStr in srcStr. case(

Hi All,When we insert relations via Collibra writer  we have defined source/target fields in the writer step. There is only one way to send relations to Collibra. We got into a case where if 1 source can have many targets eg( 1 schema with 1000 tables) and you give schema in source and table in target and you define the Import File Size as 100, the writer does not breaks the calls in 100 records instead it will send 1 call with all 1000 records since 1 schema has 1000 tables. This makes sense as sending at once makes sure that all the tables get associated to 1 schema. If it will break it into 100 then only the last call with 100 records will get related to that schema. Now to solve this problem we can send the relations to Collibra in reverse direction as well (1 table has only 1 schema). In this case the writer will correctly batch the records in 100. But inorder to do that the collibra writer should be updating the json call it sends internally. Which will be a product enhancement.

Hi ​@anna.spakova How to add a filter to a PPP that should pull columns only with DQ checks. This is because there is a limitation of columns(256) to write in excel from PPP but at source there are 500+ columns.

Hi,Can anyone please suggest the next level of certification after Ataccama ONE v15 | DQ&C Consumer Certification?Thanks in advance and Happy Learning!

hi ​@anna.spakova, ​@Lisa Kovalskaia I’m trying to enable observability on snowflake database. I keep getting this warning(?) Freshness is supported for SQL sources only. I verified the official site of Ataccama documentation and I see that snowflake is supported by default for freshness check. However, I am unable to edit freshness settings for my source connection here. Could you please help if I’m missing out on any configurations here?Thanks for your support as always!   

HelloI want to change the layout of page from single column to two columns view. Could you guide me through the process? 

Trying to run a plan on the server that will create a profile of a view. Before running the plan via the admin center, I created connection to the data source in the Runtimeconfig file. When trying to run plan, I am receiving the error message below: 2026-02-12 10:28:01 INFO: Validating model...2026-02-12 10:28:01 ERROR: Data source 'RDFINACT' specified by property dataSourceName must exist. [table_header (Jdbc Reader, offending property path=/dataSourceName) I have check that the entry in the runtimeconfig file is correct and that the plan file reflects correctly, however the issue is still occurring. Please can you point me in the direction of what to check to be able to resolve this issue.  

Hi Community,Would be glad if I get help on whether we can see actual (added or deleted) data rather than metadata marked as anomalous in DO dashboard or profile inspector inside ONE UI. 

Hi Community,I have an Ataccama dashboard with two filters:Monitoring Project Name Processing Start TimeExpected behavior: When I select a Monitoring Project (e.g., MP-1) from the first filter, the second filter should update to show only the start times related to that project.Current behavior: The Processing Start Time filter doesn't change based on the Monitoring Project selection.This makes it hard to analyze Data Quality results for multiple projects in one dashboard, as the filters aren't synced.I don't want global filters. I need local dropdown filters where Processing Start Time options depend on the selected Monitoring Project Name.Is it possible to set up dependent/cascading filters in Ataccama dashboards?Any advice is appreciated. Thanks!

Hi Team,Is there any way to add rule level notification using desktop tool or graphql and assign the recipients? 

Hi everyone,I’ve seen several posts about extracting data‑quality metadata from Ataccama ONE for Monitoring projects, using approaches like GraphQL or Metadata Reader steps. I wanted to ask if anyone has been successfully able to extract this metadata using either method.We’re running into significant challenges with both approaches:GraphQL: When drilling down to the table or data‑element level, the underlying query structure becomes extremely complex and difficult to interpret. It’s very time-consuming, and we haven’t been able to construct workable queries. Metadata Reader steps: This option requires joining multiple metadata streams, and the resulting plan becomes overly complicated.I’m trying to understand whether anyone has successfully built Data Quality dashboards by extracting metadata from Ataccama ONE, loading it into a database(Databricks), and connecting it to Power BI.If you’ve done this or have guidance, I would really appreciate connecting with you to discuss your approa

Is there any global setting at Monitoring Project level to get DQ issue detected warning if DQ percentage is less than 95%.?14.5.3 version, warning seems to be given after below 60%. It means that if for catalog item in Monitoring project shows overall data quality less than 95%, it should be shown amber warning. instead of green ok.