Master Data Management & Reference Data Management 🛰️

Hi everyone, We’ve developed an on-premises AI agent that supports users in data governance tasks such as data quality monitoring, catalog navigation, and metadata enrichment. We’re now looking to integrate this AI agent as a chat widget directly into the Ataccama ONE user interface. Our goal is to embed a floating or sidebar-style chat widget inside the Ataccama UI to provide real-time assistance to users without modifying the Ataccama core UI code. This is strictly for on-premise deployment, so cloud-based or external proxy solutions are not relevant for our use case. We’d appreciate any insights or guidance from the community on the following: Has anyone successfully embedded a custom widget into the Ataccama ONE interface? Are there any supported mechanisms or hooks for extending the UI in on-prem installations? Are there UI customization capabilities available in the Ataccama ONE roadmap for partners or customers? Happy to share our approach and progress with the community as we m

Hi All - new to Ataccama’s products and I’ve got a question re: RDM and validations. What is the best practice for creating multiple validations for a field (column) level validation, with the aim being reusability and scalability? For example, I might have the following use cases: string must be all upper case string must not contain all spaces string must be camel case string must be alpha characters only string must be alphanumeric only string can contain digits but not special characters …...etc - the list could be lengthy!……. And I want to apply the rules in various combinations like this: Column A: 1,2,4 Column B: 1,2,6 Column C: 1,2,3,5 ….etc. Current thinking: It seems like domains would be a good place to start, but that given the different permutations it would mean creating a multitude of domains, and the regex could be cumbersome. Expression validations don’t promote reuse Online services: this might be more in line with modularizing validations - setting up a “library” of

I’d like to default the referenced data display mode to “label” rather than “binding keys” as the default display mode option for all tables. See this link for details on how it is changed per table: Viewing Data in RDM :: Ataccama ONE Is there a way to accomplish this?

Hi, I'm currently working with Ataccama ONE and would like to access the MDM (Master Data Management) Web Application. Could someone please guide me on the steps to access it? Specifically: What is the typical URL format to access the MDM web interface? Do I need any specific roles or permissions to view or manage master records? Is there any difference in access for cloud vs on-premise deployments? What should I do if I don't see the MDM module after logging in?

Hello, do you plan to add feature for One Desktop regarding xsd validation of xml files? So it is possible to check if the xml file has correct structure. Thank you. Regards Veronika

Hello Ataccama Community, I'm currently managing a hybrid deployment of Ataccama ONE, where our Data Processing Engines (DPEs) are running on-premise while the rest of the platform is in the cloud. I've noticed that the ONE Data module is not available in this setup, and attempts to enable or use it result in errors or feature flags being disabled. Could you please clarify: Why is ONE Data not supported in environments running purely on hybrid DPEs (both cloud and on-premise)? Is there a technical roadmap or timeline for when ONE Data will be available or fully functional in hybrid environments? Are there any recommended workarounds or alternative approaches in the meantime for organizations that require hybrid deployment but also need ONE Data capabilities? Thank you in advance for your insights!

Hi, How is data governance concepts used in Ataccama tool?

re: Duplicate record checking upon inputting new records into RDM-Web I know about setting up the uniqueness check and validations on the data once. I have users in the Web portal potentially entering duplicate values, can we set up uniqueness checks BEFORE they publish records. So, any record that is deemed duplicate (on 1 or more columns) would not be publishable. If this question has already been submitted/answered, please direct me there. Thanks,

Hello, Looking for some help on using http proxy in RDM. We are trying to perform HTTP POST to external endpoint which is accessible only via proxy. Below param were added in JAVA_OPTS in onlinectl.sh file however -Dhttp.nonProxyHosts is ignored and ataccama is pushing all https requests via proxy. !--scriptorstartfragment--> -Dhttp.proxyHost=outbound-service-proxy.gateway.aws-euw1-np.mydomain.com \ -Dhttp.proxyUser=svc_nonprod_service_proxy_fdplife \ -Dhttp.proxyPassword=xxxx \ -Dhttp.proxyPort=80 \ -Dhttp.nonProxyHosts=localhost|127.0.0.1|*.uk-dwh.nonprod.aws-euw1-np.mydomain.com" !--scriptorendfragment-->

I want to convert the instance export table values to a new table/view. The instance export contains 3 columns that I want to utilise Sharing an example- I have the following instance table structure : MASTER_ID SOURCE_SYSTEM SOURCE_ID 001 sys1 1234 001 sys2 12232 001 sys3 1292 001 sys4 13432 001 sys2 12334 5 records from 4 different source system make a master record, I want to group it in such a manner that there is a single row for each source_system id. If a source system participate twice(with two unique records) in formation of master record, I want two rows representing the different source_ids and a column with the source system that participates twice. Here is how I intend the output table to be: MASTER_ID SYS1_ID SYS2_ID SYS3_ID SYS4_ID MULTIPLE_REC 001 1234 12232 1292 13432 SYS2 001 1234 12234 1292 13432 SYS2 Can someone help me with the ONE Desktop step I can use for this?I have explored using Aggregating Column Assigner to group records but I but that wouldnt help.I think

Let’s say I have a table that has 500,000 rows. I need to query this table using REST API (because I want to get both published records and records still in edited/waiting for publish states). I have some params to filter the data with, but even with params, the result set could be say, 10000. I tried using the REST API using JSON call step in a plan, setting “count” to 10000, and the API says maximum is 1000. I see that the REST API provides the offset param as well. Is there an example of how I can use that offset param to paginate and query all the records that I will need, but in one plan/component? This component will be a part of a complex set of components as a larger operation, and I’d prefer to not have to create an extra .ewf and iterator for it, otherwise this whole thing gets too complicate for anyone else to understand… Any ideas?

Need help with graphQL query. I need to bring in All the metrics like DQ scores, Overall quality for CIs that are part of monitoring projects. Is there a way to get it? Also, do we have document which tells us more about when to use edges and nodes appropriately.

Hello, Is it possible to self-join tables in RDM to populate some information? I would like to try something like shown in the screenshot. Attribute 4 and 5 values are selected from RDM UI. So, dropdown should only show values from the same table where att2 = CAT2 for Att4 and att2 = CAT3 for Att4 Table1 Selection from RDM UI Att1 Att2 Att3 Att4 (where att2 = CAT2) Att5 (where att2 = CAT3) ID1 CAT1 val1 ID3 ID5 ID2 CAT1 val2 ID4 ID6 ID3 CAT2 val3 ID4 CAT2 val4 ID5 CAT3 val5 ID6 CAT3 val6 I somehow tried to create self join in relationship like below. I was able toi upload configuration successfully on RDM with these relationships. However, when edit the record on RDM the lookup is blank. it does not show any value although table is populated. (this can also be understood as employee info vs manager info relationship. Both info are available in the employee table) Thanks in advance. Ojaswini

We have multiple Realm roles created for our data domains in the below fashion Data Domain 1 Realm Role - Data Owner Realm Role - Data Steward Data Domain 2 Realm Role - Data Owner Realm Role - Data Steward How can I merge Data Domain 1 and Data Domain 2 into one single New Domain and merge the corresponding Realm Roles? I.e. Data Domain 1 Realm Role - Data Owner Realm Role - Data Steward = New Data Domain Data Domain 2 New Realm Role - Data Owner Realm Role - Data Owner New Realm Role - Data Steward Realm Role - Data Steward

How can we retrieve or read the workflow status (running, success, or failed. Etc) using a GET API after triggering the workflow via an Http service?

Hello, I wanted to know that how do we implement matching options in the master layer of the MDM project. I have used in the columns in the instance layer and then used the same in the master layer in the matching step just as used in the cdi example. and then I have used the same name in the matching step but still nothing is showing the UI part. Can someone help me with that.

Hello everyone, My organization will soon be upgrading to a higher version of Ataccama, and I want to make sure the transition goes as smoothly as possible. I'm reaching out to ask: What should I be documenting or looking out for before, during, and after the upgrade? Some specific things I'm wondering: Are there key areas (like DQ rules, workflows, configurations, etc.) that I should definitely back up or document? What kind of testing should I plan for in UAT? Should I be validating things both before and after the upgrade? Are there any common issues or changes I should be aware of that might affect how things work in the new version? If anyone has experience with a recent version upgrade, I’d love to hear what worked well for you—or what you wish you had done differently! Also, if there are any official resources or checklists from Ataccama that you found useful, feel free to share. Thanks in advance!

07.05.2025 16:24:30 [INFO] Using Ataccama DQC configuration file D:\ataccama\workspace1\General MDM project - CDI example\Files\engine\trans\address\address_match.comp07.05.2025 16:24:30 [INFO] Using runtime configuration file C:\Users\AS001086183\AppData\Local\Temp\runtimeCfg31836356917877677.tmp07.05.2025 16:24:30 [INFO] Ataccama DQC engine initialized.07.05.2025 16:24:30 [INFO] Creating runtime...07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] [Address deduplication] parallel processing of partitions: false07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] [Address deduplication] parallel processing of key rules: false07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] [Address deduplication] parallel processing of matching rules: false07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] Starting runtime...07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] Running runtime...07.05.2025 16:24:31 [FATAL] Internal error occurred during run of the plan: Persistence is not set (the standalone mode may not be configured)[STEP Address deduplication[Md Unify]]07.05.2025 16:24:31 [INFO] Stopping runtime...07.0

Hello everyone, I’m working on a project that integrates a data masking tool with Ataccama, and I’m encountering some issues when trying to retrieve actual catalog item data (the row-level data) via the REST API. I’ve been testing both GraphQL and REST approaches, and here’s what I’ve found so far: GraphQL vs. REST for Data Retrieval:The GraphQL API appears to focus on metadata – attributes, versioning, policies, etc. However, based on my understanding, the actual table data (the rows and cells) isn’t available through GraphQL; it’s only accessible via a REST endpoint. Based on available documentation for MDM and RDM REST APIs, the REST endpoints follow a pattern using a fixed base path (/api/rest) on the default port (8051) and use basic HTTP authentication. Endpoint URL Confusion:Initially, I attempted to use an endpoint like: https://teranet.test.ataccama.online/catalog/data/catalogItem/<gid>/datawhich returned a 404 error. Later, based on the docs, I switched to the documented REST

Hi All, I have a question regarding RDM approval workflow. In our project, we have stages Initiator → Review → Publish. We have a customer request to allow RDM_admin users to participate in the approval process (i.e., they must be able to review and publish records) but not receive any email notifications. We tried removing RDM_admin role from Notifications section, but that didn’t help because this role remains in Workflows section. We can’t remove RDM_admin role from Workflows section, since that would prevent RDM_admin users from reviewing or rejecting records at all, they wouldn’t be able to participate in Approval workflow. The following settings don’t work, RDM_admin users still receive emails: Is there a way to keep RDM_admin’s ability to review and publish without receiving emails? Perhaps by checking user’s role or username in the Conditions section, so that Approval workflow gets skipped for certain users? The documentation for version 15.4 mentions something like meta.userna

I am trying to do validation on Tin , on which score and explanation are getting populated but the records which are invalid are not getting highlighted in red and i have enabled validation in the Tin column Attaching the snapshots of the steps which i have done while configuring the validation: How should i fix this.

We made changes into the clean operation of an entity. it will take effects for new transactions. How can we apply this to the current records that we already have into the database? We are exploring use a full reprocess of this entity: but we have some doubts about the setup. For example: What is the difference between a reprocess vs rematch checkbox? We tried to read the documentation but there is not detail explanation about it. Thanks in advance!