Hi everyone! I wanted to share some best practices when it comes to GIT version control, how you can organize your branches in a way that merges and rollbacks are more granular, making it easier as well to see what code changes were done where Typically, what I tell clients when they are using GIT integrated with Ataccama, is that they would essentially need to have a standard flow control process for their branches. What I mean by that, is that they should set up 1 main production branch, 1 development branch, and many feature branches. You can think about it like this, your Master branch can be thought of as your “Production” branch, your Development branch can be thought of as your “Test” server, and each of those feature branches you can see it as your “Dev” server where you develop new code. How this works is simple yet effective: You start off with a main branch in your repo, we can call it “master” Master can have either prior code or be empty, let's say it has some code in it a
